Strict NPO: Is It Doing More Harm Than Good?
The bedside table was immaculate. Not a crumb, not a drop of water, just the sterile silence of a hospital room and a pristine, empty styrofoam cup.
Imagine Elena, 78. Three days ago, a quick swallow screen identified concerns for aspiration, and the team made the difficult decision to order NPO. Now, Elena, otherwise alert and oriented, sits staring at that empty cup, her lips cracked, her tongue thick with drying secretions. When her grandson walks in with flowers, her first and only word is a desperate whisper: "Water."
As the Speech-Language Pathologist, you feel the immediate, professional panic—the fear that drove the NPO order. But you also feel the ethical weight of the collateral damage: the agonizing dry mouth, the atrophy of the swallowing muscles, and the thick, bacterial film coating her mouth. The intervention meant to save her life is now robbing her of dignity and potentially creating a worse pulmonary risk than resuming PO intake would have.
What’s the answer?
It's no secret that dysphagia management can be a complex and emotionally charged area. We often face difficult decisions with limited evidence to guide us. One of the most challenging dilemmas is determining when to make a patient NPO.
While a strict NPO may seem protective against aspiration, it can have unintended consequences that may do more harm than good.
Strict NPO
When a patient is kept on strict NPO, several potential complications can arise:
Xerostomia: Severe dry mouth can occur, leading to discomfort, difficulty swallowing, and an increased risk of oral infections.
Thick Secretions: The oral cavity can become coated with thick, dried secretions, which impede oral hygiene and increase the risk of aspiration.
Mucus Plugging: In severe cases, thick secretions can obstruct the airway, leading to respiratory distress.
Muscle Atrophy: Muscles involved in swallowing can weaken and atrophy due to disuse, making it more difficult for the patient to resume oral feeding later on.
Don’t forget, they can still aspirate saliva
You can take away their food. You can take away their liquid. But you can’t take away their saliva. It's important to remember that even when patients are NPO, they continue to produce oropharyngeal secretions. Saliva can harbor bacteria, and aspiration of saliva can lead to pneumonia. In fact, it’s the most recognized cause of aspiration pneumonia.
In this sense, dry secretions can be more dangerous than thin liquids because they are often filled with potentially harmful pathogens and stickier and thus more difficult to clear from the airway.
A more cautious approach to NPO
Strict NPO should be reserved for situations where it is absolutely necessary. In many cases, alternative approaches can help manage aspiration risk while maintaining some level of oral intake.
Free Water Protocol: Allowing patients to have water between meals can help maintain hydration and oral hygiene, even if they require thickened liquids for other drinks.
Ice Chips: Ice chips can provide sensory stimulation and help with oral hygiene without the risk of aspiration associated with larger volumes of liquid.
Oral Care: Just because they’re not eating, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t still clean their mouths. In fact, regular and thorough oral care is essential for all patients, but especially those with dysphagia. It helps remove bacteria, maintain moisture, and stimulate the swallowing mechanism.
The fear of aspiration—of that single, visible cough—is a primal one, often overriding our clinical judgment. But as professionals, we are obligated to fight that fear with facts and compassionate caution.
For Elena, the strict NPO had pushed her to the brink. Her swallowing muscles were beginning to atrophy from disuse, and her thick, dry secretions were coating her oral cavity, making her at higher risk if she were to aspirate her own saliva.
After reviewing the evidence, you advocated a different plan of care. You explained that strict NPO was likely doing more harm than good in this situation. Until an instrumental swallowing evaluation can be completed to guide the plan of care further, you recommended two low-risk interventions:
A strict, four-times-daily oral care protocol to remove bacteria and stimulate her swallowing mechanism.
The immediate use of small amounts of water and ice as tolerated.
When the nurse brought in the first cup of ice water, Elena took it in both hands. She didn't swallow perfectly, but her relief was visible. You hadn't eliminated the risk—no one can—but you had chosen the path of progress over fear, improving her comfort, supporting her dignity, and enhancing her chances of a successful recovery in the long term.
Fighting fear with facts
It's understandable to be cautious when managing dysphagia, but we must not let fear dictate our decisions. By understanding the potential risks of strict NPO and embracing evidence-based alternatives, we can provide more compassionate and effective care.
What are YOUR thoughts on strict NPO orders? Share your experiences and insights in the comments below!
Liked this post? Share it with your colleagues and help us spread the word about patient-centered dysphagia care!
